Wednesday, May 23rd, 2012
Today's weather     
About the author

The business of politics
BY Remi Adekoya
Remi Adekoya, WBJ journalist READ MORE

Add to Technorati Favorites
Archives
CATEGORIES
Last comments

I was a Boeing 737 Captain and an Aviation Lawyer involved in several accident investigations worldwide. I have read the entire report of the Smolensk Crash and make the following obsevations:- 1 Most aircraft accidents do not have a single 'cause' but many contributory factors. 2 The Smolensk report identifies many shortcomings, namely pilot training, weather, poor airport preparation, poor risk assessment of the airport etc. 3 However one factor surmounting all of these is that the crew continued the descent below the authorised permitted height of 100metres. Had they not done so many of the other factors would have been irrelevant. 4 Air Traffic Control, whether adequate or not, has no relevance to a Captain's decision to descend below operating limits. 5 There is no evidence to suggest that the aircraft was destroyed by anything other than contact, initially by the port wing hitting the trees, and then the catastrophic impact of the whole aircraft with the ground. In relation to the 'conspiracy' theories, if an aircraft 'accident' were to be used to conduct an 'assassination' the method employed would more likely be a bomb, detonated on a timing device, a radio/telephone signal or a barometric switch. Using any of these methods so close to the ground and seconds from landing would risk failure of the objective. To achive success in an assassination involving as many factors as were involved in this crash would require inconceivable co-ordination, including convincing both pilots to commit suicide. Having read this report I conclude that this was no more than a tragic accident resulting from many factors. The fact that an accident results in the death of the President of a country does not prevent it from being an accident. Geoffrey Nicholson
11 Wed, Apr 2012

Hello. Good Day. This is Faisal from Bangladesh. We have a real estate company (3G BUILDING TECHNOLOGY LTD) & we are the registered company of Bangladesh Government. Now we have some projects for build up new building. we have also land in Coxbazer project. As you know, Coxbazer is the largest sea beach in the world. If we build up a resort or any kind of 3 star hotels & sell that project than it will be so profitable business. Dhaka is the capital city & Chittagong is the port city of Bangladesh. Dear Sir as per Bangladesh government announcement, Bangladesh real estate sector is number one rising sector in Bangladesh. Real estate Market of Bangladesh is almost saturated by the thousands of real estate Company which is around Dhaka, Chittagong, Sylhet and some district of Bangladesh but we have not enough money for construction work. We will make per square feet US 38$ & we can sell per square feet US 64$ average (in Dhaka). We are looking for a business partner to increase our business level & we decided that, we will sell some share of our company to investor as a chairman or director. Dear sir many countries investor are invested in our country. Such as 1. China - company name: China Garden City Developers Ltd. 2. America - company name: America Purbanchol city. 3. Japan - company name: Japan Bangladesh Friendship society & etc. I would like you to join me; it is a highly profitable business. Kindly contact me & I can tell you each & everything in detail & we can further go on. Waiting for your answer. With best regards Shekh Md. Faisal. Director. 3G BUILDING TECHNOLOGY LTD. Address: House No- 1010/A Road No- 16 Khilgaon. Dhaka-1219. Bangladesh. Phone: +880 1917 162751, +880 1841 162751. E-mail: info.3gbtl@gmail.com, mdshekhfaisal@gmail.com
8 Wed, Feb 2012

Technorati Profile

PO government increasingly unpopular: so what?
  Posted on 21 Tue, Feb 2012, with tags:
Bookmark and Share

Prime Minister Donald Tusk and his ruling Civic Platform (PO) party have been taking a hammering in the polls recently.

A February TNS OBOP survey indicates that 70 percent of Poles now disapprove of the way the government is running the country while only 23 percent think it is doing a good job.

Meanwhile, Mr Tusk himself has a job-approval rating of just 28 percent, the lowest since he arrived in office.

The government has been strongly criticized in the media for the confusion surrounding a prescription-drug reform implemented in January this year, for initially supporting the highly-unpopular ACTA treaty and for controversy regarding the newly-built zł.2 billion National Stadium, which is said to fall short of the required standard in several respects.

The PM's proposal to increase the retirement age to 67 for both men and women has understandably not won him many friends either.

Mediocre competition

In a competitive political environment, the ruling party's slip-ups would have caused it to lose a considerable amount of ground to its rivals. But Poland's political scene is far from competitive.

Even though many have started to lose faith in PO, they are by no means turning to the biggest opposition party, Law and Justice (PiS), which is simply too conservative, too nationalistic and too aesthetically unpalatable for the majority of Poles.

According to recent voter surveys, a few Poles seem to be turning to the other parliamentary opposition parties, namely the leftist Democratic Left Alliance (SLD) and Palikot's Movement (RP).

But those parties are likewise incapable of wooing over anything close to a majority of voters.

SLD, which ruled Poland between 2001-2005 is mainly remembered for the corruption scandals which plagued the country during its time in office. The party has not managed to recover since then and is still not considered trustworthy and credible by most Poles.

RP, meanwhile, is led by the often irritating, narcissistic Janusz Palikot, who, while supported by some 12-15 percent of Poles, has the largest negative electorate (45 percent) after PiS leader Jarosław Kaczyński.

Mr Palikot is a nihilist, ready to say or do anything just to be at the center of attention, and most Poles simply don't take him very seriously.

RP's mix of very socially and economically liberal views are also unlikely to attract a huge number of Poles.

A monopoly

All this means that despite all the disappointment and frustration many Poles feel with PO, they simply don't see any alternative to the current ruling party and its leader Donald Tusk.

What's worse, PO politicians are perfectly aware of this and thus the criticism they are currently receiving is unlikely to make them step up their game as it would if they had serious political rivals. Only the PM himself is capable of jolting his ministers into better performances.

Journalists and political observers can criticize, lament and lambaste all they want but the truth of the matter is that in the end, PO can still turn around and say “Ok, we're useless, but so what?” And honestly speaking, it's difficult to respond to that.

 

 

Care to comment? Loginorregister
 
Other blogs
The business of politics
Courage, Mr prime minister
BY Remi Adekoya
A mid-May TNS Polska poll indicates that the ruling Civic Platform (PO) now has 28 percent support among Poles, ahead of Law ... READ MORE
The business of politics
Polish politics hits new low
BY Remi Adekoya
It is difficult to think of any major European country where there is as much polarization and hatred between political parties and ... READ MORE
Our partners