Wednesday, May 23rd, 2012
Today's weather     
About the author

The business of politics
BY Remi Adekoya
Remi Adekoya, WBJ journalist READ MORE

Add to Technorati Favorites
Archives
CATEGORIES
Last comments

I was a Boeing 737 Captain and an Aviation Lawyer involved in several accident investigations worldwide. I have read the entire report of the Smolensk Crash and make the following obsevations:- 1 Most aircraft accidents do not have a single 'cause' but many contributory factors. 2 The Smolensk report identifies many shortcomings, namely pilot training, weather, poor airport preparation, poor risk assessment of the airport etc. 3 However one factor surmounting all of these is that the crew continued the descent below the authorised permitted height of 100metres. Had they not done so many of the other factors would have been irrelevant. 4 Air Traffic Control, whether adequate or not, has no relevance to a Captain's decision to descend below operating limits. 5 There is no evidence to suggest that the aircraft was destroyed by anything other than contact, initially by the port wing hitting the trees, and then the catastrophic impact of the whole aircraft with the ground. In relation to the 'conspiracy' theories, if an aircraft 'accident' were to be used to conduct an 'assassination' the method employed would more likely be a bomb, detonated on a timing device, a radio/telephone signal or a barometric switch. Using any of these methods so close to the ground and seconds from landing would risk failure of the objective. To achive success in an assassination involving as many factors as were involved in this crash would require inconceivable co-ordination, including convincing both pilots to commit suicide. Having read this report I conclude that this was no more than a tragic accident resulting from many factors. The fact that an accident results in the death of the President of a country does not prevent it from being an accident. Geoffrey Nicholson
11 Wed, Apr 2012

Hello. Good Day. This is Faisal from Bangladesh. We have a real estate company (3G BUILDING TECHNOLOGY LTD) & we are the registered company of Bangladesh Government. Now we have some projects for build up new building. we have also land in Coxbazer project. As you know, Coxbazer is the largest sea beach in the world. If we build up a resort or any kind of 3 star hotels & sell that project than it will be so profitable business. Dhaka is the capital city & Chittagong is the port city of Bangladesh. Dear Sir as per Bangladesh government announcement, Bangladesh real estate sector is number one rising sector in Bangladesh. Real estate Market of Bangladesh is almost saturated by the thousands of real estate Company which is around Dhaka, Chittagong, Sylhet and some district of Bangladesh but we have not enough money for construction work. We will make per square feet US 38$ & we can sell per square feet US 64$ average (in Dhaka). We are looking for a business partner to increase our business level & we decided that, we will sell some share of our company to investor as a chairman or director. Dear sir many countries investor are invested in our country. Such as 1. China - company name: China Garden City Developers Ltd. 2. America - company name: America Purbanchol city. 3. Japan - company name: Japan Bangladesh Friendship society & etc. I would like you to join me; it is a highly profitable business. Kindly contact me & I can tell you each & everything in detail & we can further go on. Waiting for your answer. With best regards Shekh Md. Faisal. Director. 3G BUILDING TECHNOLOGY LTD. Address: House No- 1010/A Road No- 16 Khilgaon. Dhaka-1219. Bangladesh. Phone: +880 1917 162751, +880 1841 162751. E-mail: info.3gbtl@gmail.com, mdshekhfaisal@gmail.com
8 Wed, Feb 2012

Technorati Profile

Europe divides Poland
  Posted on 20 Tue, Dec 2011, with tags:
Bookmark and Share

The last few weeks have seen Polish domestic politics dominated by discussions on Europe and for as long as the continent's crisis continues, that is likely to be the case. It is the attitude towards Europe that has drawn the line of demarcation between the competing parties in Poland.

On the one side we have Prime Minister Donald Tusk's government which has made it very clear that it favors closer integration with the EU and wants to remain in what it has termed “Europe's mainstream.”

Foreign Minister Radosław Sikorski went even further in his much-publicized Berlin speech in November, saying that a European federation is needed, one which would have Germany in the driving seat.

The government's stance is shared by the opposition parties Democratic Left Alliance (SLD) and Palikot's Movement (RP).

Traitors

In the opposing trench, we have politicians from Poland's biggest opposition party, Law and Justice (PiS), saying Mr Sikorski longs for the “Fourth Reich” and that “Poles would be like Indians in the reservations” in the Europe proposed by the foreign minister. They say Poland's sovereignty is under threat and that Mr Sikorski is a traitor.

In a rally organized by PiS on December 13, party leader Jarosław Kaczyński said that “if not for the sick state of our country, we would be marching forward like China, we would be the leader of the world. Wake up Poland.”

Mr Kaczyński either a) has a rather tenuous grasp of reality, b) got carried away by the moment or c) is just trying to rally his electorate with rhetoric he knows is pure rubbish.

Alternatively, a combination of all these three factors stood behind his ramblings.

Why should we pay for them?

PiS has also slammed the PM for agreeing to a Polish contribution to the €200 billion loan to the IMF which will be used to assist euro zone members who are at risk.

“Why should we, poor Poland, pay for the excesses of the Italians and the Greeks who are much richer than we?” is the general gist of their protest.

The average Pole, who sees prices rising practically every week (while wages barely keep up), can definitely identify with this message. PiS is hoping people will get sufficiently frustrated with their personal situations that they stop supporting the pro-European government, opting instead for what Mr Kaczyński has called “a truly Polish government” (read: one led by the PiS leader himself).

PiS of course neglected to mention to their electorate that one of the euro zone countries in trouble, Italy, is the third-biggest net payer to the EU while Poland remains the biggest net receiver of EU funds. In 2009, for example, Italy paid in EUR6 billion to the EU's coffers while Poland received roughly the same amount in funds.

But there have always been those on Poland's right who treat the EU as useful for only as long as it remains a cash cow. “If they're giving money, of course we'll take it. After all we suffered for so many years under communism because the West betrayed us after the Second World War, so we deserve it,” is the sentiment often expressed by some rightist circles in Poland.

Well ... he didn't really mean it

But PiS's anti-federation narrative has been damaged by a speech which Donald Tusk quoted while addressing parliament last week.

“If Europe wants to create a new entity ... one which will last for many generations, one which maybe sometime in history will become a federation that would be very powerful on a world scale, then it has to pass this exam: [deeper integration for countries to the east of Europe, like Ukraine].”

“And I would encourage this, even while representing a country which is currently gaining from EU membership but which would, if what I am talking about were to come true, gain less. I realize that and I agree to it in advance.”

This statement was made by none other than the late President Lech Kaczyński, co-founder of PiS, in a speech he gave in Berlin in 2006.

PiS was furious, saying Mr Tusk had taken the words out of context and that Lech Kaczyński hadn't really called for a European federation – but that didn't change the fact that the late president did actually use the F-word in his Berlin speech.

Even Donald Tusk has not done so thus far, which shows just how sensitive the matter is in Poland.

Politically profitable

Indeed, portraying itself as a party which is fighting to keep Poland independent while PO wants to make it a German colony has worked for PiS so far.

The latest TNS-OBOP poll showed support for the party at 27 percent, up from the 19 percent support it had before Mr Sikorski's controversial Berlin speech and the whole sovereignty debate started in earnest.

Support for PO also increased, albeit on a much lower level – 38 percent now back the ruling party, up from 36 percent in the previous poll.

Meanwhile, in another TNS OBOP survey Poles were asked if they agreed with Mr Sikorski's proposal for a European federation. Just over a third supported the idea, just over a third were against it and the rest had no opinion. It is those in the third group that both parties are now fighting to draw into their camp.

Since 2007, PiS has not been able to defeat PO in any election, irrespective of the domestic issues they have raised during campaigns.

But with the mood darkening in Europe and with people feeling increasingly wary of what the future holds for them, Jarosław Kaczyński's party now hopes that what has up until now been one of PO's greatest strengths among Polish voters, namely their strong pro-European stance, will eventually be the cause of their downfall.

 

Care to comment? Loginorregister
 
Other blogs
The business of politics
Courage, Mr prime minister
BY Remi Adekoya
A mid-May TNS Polska poll indicates that the ruling Civic Platform (PO) now has 28 percent support among Poles, ahead of Law ... READ MORE
The business of politics
Polish politics hits new low
BY Remi Adekoya
It is difficult to think of any major European country where there is as much polarization and hatred between political parties and ... READ MORE
Our partners