Thursday, June 20th, 2013
Today's weather     
About the author

Corporate Finance/M&A Corner
BY Les Nemethy
CEO Euro-Phoenix Financial Advisors READ MORE

Add to Technorati Favorites
My links
Archives
Technorati Profile

What can you expect from a private equity investor?
  Posted on 12 Mon, Mar 2012, with tags: equity, private, investor
Bookmark and Share

 

 

A private equity investment has the obvious advantage of bringing money to a company. Most company owners are not aware of all the implications – beyond the money – of bringing on board a private equity investor.

Taking your company to the next level
Private equity investors are financially driven. They ambitiously target high levels of return – generally an Internal Rate of Return of 25% or more. Shareholders and managers must convince the private equity investor of the potential and strategy for value creation, and management’s ability to execute the strategy. Private equity can be a partner for taking the company to the next level. For example, a private equity investor may be an excellent partner for helping to take your company international, or take it onto the stock exchange.

Mid-term time horizon
Private equity investors do not want to be invested in a company forever. A four- to seven-year time horizon is typical. One of the first questions they will ask when considering investing into a company is: “What is my exit strategy?” The lack of a credible exit strategy is almost always a deal breaker. So don’t expect private equity to be invested forever.

Management must generally stay
Owner-managers looking for a total exit will be disappointed. Private equity will generally want an owner-manager to retain a significant minority interest in a business, and to remain committed as a manager, for at least the our- to seven-year investment cycle mentioned above. (One exception is where private equity makes a “bolt-on” acquisition, where they buy a company to add to one of their existing holdings).

Emphasis on corporate governance and financial management
Very often private equity investors will want to appoint the Chief Financial Officer. They will want to have a properly constituted and active board. Decisions will need to be well prepared, transparent, and documented. This can be an important part of the maturation of a firm. Private equity investors, via the board of directors, will want to be involved in decisions with respect to strategy, business plans, major investments, hiring or firing of senior staff, etc., while leaving day-to-day operating decisions to management, so long as management is performing according to plan.

“Carrots and sticks” with respect to achieving plan
Private equity generally allow for generous bonuses when plan is met or exceeded. On the other hand, private equity will ask for the owner-manager’s remaining interest to be diluted if the company does not achieve the business plan provided at the time of investment. Also, private equity investors generally insist on having the right to dismiss the owner-manager (e.g. assuming he or she stays on as CEO), in the event that plans are missed by a certain margin.

Drag along and tag along rights
Private equity investors will often insist on having the right to sell the remaining shares of the owner-manager at the time they are exiting. Usually this type of clause only takes effect after a good many years (e.g four or five years from the time the private equity firm invests into a company). Before such period, the parties may investigate options for the private equity firm to exit without triggering the exit of the owner-manager, if the latter does not wish to exit. In other words, the drag along rights may become a default option, to be exercised only after a certain period if private equity cannot exit without dragging the owner-manager along. These provisions may be a problem for those owner-managers who wish to hold their equity stakes for the very long term.

Variations among private equity players
I do not mean to create the impression that all private equity firms are identical. While most will insist on taking a controlling interest, some will accept a minority interest. While most will insist on injecting money into the company, many will also buy shares of the current shareholder(s). Some private equity funds are more “hands on” than others. Some will have sector focuses and expertise. Some will be more compatible with the personality of the current shareholder(s) and manager(s) than others. Some will prefer larger or smaller transaction sizes than others. It pays to do your research and talk to different players.

In a nutshell, a private equity investor may be a very appropriate partner for an owner-manager who has a reasonable degree of confidence in achieving high growth in the value of his or her firm with a capital infusion, and is willing to go along with the aforementioned way of doing business of private equity investors. But it is not for every business owner.

 

 

 

  Comments (0)         READ MORE  
Inventors often have brilliant ideas, often excellent patents. Yet bringing them to market may be a tremendous challenge. Finding investors for going concerns is hard enough; finding investors for new, greenfield projects is even harder. This article will first deal with some of the reasons why finding investors is such a challenge for inventors; and second, I will talk about what investors look for and what an inventor can do to maximize the probability of finding investors. 
 
Why is finding investors for inventions such a challenge?
 
In a nutshell, it boils down to lack of track record. There is many a slip between cup and lip, between idea and execution, to the point of an invention commercialized to successfully delivering cash flow and value for investors. Hence, risk is significantly higher than for a going concern, where a company has already gone through its teething issues, and usually already established cash flow. It therefore takes a certain breed of investor who has the kind of appetite for risk, and the expertise to evaluate investment proposals. There are relatively few of these in Central Europe, particularly who are prepared to offer equity financing for larger amounts.
 
Where inventors come up with a brilliant inventions or technologies, and then seek to commercialize it, they run into numerous challenges:
 
  • If the invention is not patented, the act of showing their concept to potential investors increases the chances that someone will run away with the idea.
  • More often than not, inventors are looking to raise financing on a shoestring budget. They lack the funds necessary to obtain patent protection, advisory fees, market research, etc. You usually get what you pay for.
  • The inventor often does not have the expertise to commercialize the project; often they will seek to maintain control of the venture. From the perspective of an investor, it is a non-starter to have a project managed and controlled by someone with only technical expertise, lacking commercial expertise, or indeed the experience and track record of launching a comparable project.
  • There may be a significant valuation gap between what the inventor expects for his world-changing invention, and what an investor is prepared to pay. For example, I once met a physician who had a truly remarkable invention that was likely to dramatically alter the fight against cancer. But he was expecting to raise over $200 million, while keeping control, and lacking any real business experience. A non-starter.
What investors look for and what a project promoter can do to maximize the probability of finding investors
 
  • Generally to finance an invention, there must be a powerful idea. A ho-hum idea, or even a strong idea, might be insufficient. The idea must be outstanding. And preferably, it should be an idea that has certain barriers to entry (e.g. patent protection).
  •  While it is probably not possible to cure the lack of track record with respect to bringing a particular technology or project to market, it is possible to put forward a project team that has depth of relevant experience. This will add credibility, hence reduce perceived risk for investors.
  • It is important to provide as much visibility as possible on the revenue side: is it possible to receive orders? A strongly worded letter of intent? Or detailed market research that will forecast demand in a way that will be credible for investors? The better you can do, the better the chances of financing.
  • You must also get a grip on the cost side of the equation, and capital expenditures. A project with a low “burn rate”, everything else being equal, will be preferred to a project that is “gold plated”. 
  • The investor will want to see professionally prepared projections that give an appropriate risk-adjusted rate of return.
There are thousands of worthy technologies and inventions throughout Central Europe that are not achieving funding due to the factors mentioned above. This is a loss not only for inventors, but for society at large. 

  Comments (3)         READ MORE  
 
Other blogs
The business of politics
Donald Tusk the social democrat?
BY Remi Adekoya
Currently on a charm offensive after weeks of bad press, Prime Minister Donald Tusk told weekly Polityka that “the longer one is ... READ MORE
Stratfor on Geopolitics
The growing importance of the Arctic Council
BY Stratfor Global Intelligence
The Arctic is expected to become more important in the coming decades as climate change makes natural resources and transport routes more ... READ MORE
Our partners