I moderated at a private equity
conference in London last week on the subject of what private equity
firms are doing with respect to exiting in the current business
environment. Even if you are not from the private equity industry, I
believe the subject is still of general interest, as it provides
trends on what sophisticated market participants are doing in an
often difficult market.
The following chart gives an overview
of exits for the European private equity industry:
Private Equity Exits in Europe, 2007 to 2011 Q3
Source, European Venture Capital Association, Index Q1 2007 = 100
The main points made
at the conference about private equity exits were as follows:
1. Not all sectors and countries are experiencing downturns. Poland has been the most robust market, thanks to its strong macroeconomic performance vis-à-vis other countries. There have also been certain sectors, such as IT and technology, that have performed quite well. So there were still 160 private equity exits Europe-wide (*) in Q3 2011, the most recent statistics available – just to strategic investors.
2. The number of firms written off by private equity investors is also surprisingly common – also 160 firms in Q3 2011, Europe wide, in Q3 2011(*).
3. Most private equity owners have postponed exits on a number of their investments. So for example, whereas in the first half of the previous decade, the average hold was only about 4 years (*), that number has no crept up to 7-8 years for many PE firms.
4. As it his harder to grow top-line revenues in many sectors of the economy, private equity firms may hope that multiples improve over time; but hope, in itself, is not a strategy. Many private equity firms are putting much more emphasis on operational improvements to build value.
5. One of the reasons for which it is so hard to exit in the current market is the difficulty of giving performance forecasts. In many sectors, it is very difficult to predict what will happen even in a three-to-six-month horizon – the time it takes to move from a Letter of Intent (LOI) to closing. In this type of environment, a seller can either give a conservative forecast (which will greatly diminish valuation), or provide a more optimistic forecast. If this more optimistic forecast is missed, it will devastate the value of the firm even more than under the former scenario, because it destroys the credibility of management in forecasting performance, even over the short-term.
One strategy for avoiding the risk
of missing budgets is to diminish, as much as possible, the period
between LOI and closing. For mid-sized companies, this might be
accomplished in 10-12 weeks, provided that there is an extremely
thorough advance preparation, which would include having everything
ready that an investor would want to have at their fingertips,
including a completed data room, perhaps even with a completed vendor
due diligence. Some competition in the process, to keep bidders
moving according to a preset time line, can also help prevent the
process from lagging.
In a nutshell, while the environment is
not easy for most private equity firms, there are some excellent
strategies to deal with the current situation. For those private
equity firms with capital available, it is generally a buyers’
market, and the diminished credit available from banks in most
countries means that companies generally seek more equity.
While
there is something of a shakeout happening in the Central European
private equity industry, this is not happening as quickly as some
pundits were forecasting in the months immediately after the Lehman
crisis. It is primarily those private equity firms that show a good
track record, even during the tough times, that will be more
successful at raising funds. There is something of a flight to
quality among those institutions and individuals who invest in
private equity funds. It will be even more difficult for new entrants
to compete against 10-15 years of positive track record.
My
prediction, therefore, is that over the coming five years, there will
be fewer but larger private equity firms active in Central Europe.
(*) Statistics provided courtesy of the European Private Equity Association.












